Overseas Civilian Contractors

News and issues relating to Civilian Contractors working Overseas

Army tries to up pay to contractor staff

Jill R. Aitoro  Senior Reporter Washington Business Journal Fed Biz Daily  June 23, 2011

In a recent article in Washington Business Journal, I wrote about the federal government’s growing influence over contractor pay through labor-rate freezes. Interestingly, an award decision by the Army reaffirmed that intended influence, but with the opposite result: Denying a contract win to a company based on the belief that the employees were not going to get paid enough.

Here’s what happened: Military Professional Resources Initiative Inc., an Alexandria-based subsidiary of L-3 Services Inc., bid as the incumbent for a contract to provide mentoring, training, subject-matter expertise and program support to the Afghan military, in the ongoing effort to prepare its troops to take over its own security. Stating in its proposal that it was updating salaries based on the current market conditions, MPRI proposed a significant reduction in direct labor rates to its employees relative to those under its incumbent contract.

As submitted, this did give MPRI a more cost-competitive bid than DynCorpbizWatchDynCorpFollow this company International LLC, the Falls Church-based company that eventually won the contract (MPRI bid $212.7 million for the contract, while DynCorp bid $249.1 million). But the Army changed that, stating that MPRI “grossly underestimated” its labor costs, which would result in high turnover, a lack of qualified personnel, and high risk of performance disruptions or failures. It then increased MPRI’s labor rates to the current levels under its incumbent contract.

Warranted argument by the Army? The Government Accountability Office didn’t think so, sustaining a protest filed by MPRI and stating in the decision that the Army’s analysis was not reasonable, and resulted in an excessive upward adjustment to MPRI’s proposed labor rates.

Perhaps MPRI’s employees are less than satisfied with that decision, given that they’d receive a pay cut if awarded the contract after the proposals are reevaluated, but this may actually be deemed a victory for contractors that prefer agencies leave compensation decisions up to company managers and executives.

Email: jaitoro@bizjournals.com

June 23, 2011 - Posted by | Civilian Contractors, Contracts Awarded, DynCorp | , , ,

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: